Hi, Guest
09-01-2005, 05:38 AM
Is it possible to put a Twin Turbo in a Foci?
Turbo arrived!
Thread Rating:
|
Twin Turbo?
|
 
09-01-2005, 06:21 AM
Yes but its stupid and a waste of money. Hence why no one comes out with twin turbo kits for cars.
Dan, Your friendly neighbourhood asshole.
 I do installs and build FG stuff, pm me if you need help with anything. Im cheap. 
09-01-2005, 07:06 AM
not to mention just how innefficient it would be...
Contribute to focuscanada.net's future! Donations of $20 and over get a custom title!
09-01-2005, 08:10 AM
darkpuppet,Aug 31 2005, 05:06 PM Wrote:not to mention just how innefficient it would be... Why would it be innefficient?
Turbo arrived!
09-01-2005, 09:03 AM
cause spooling up 2 turbos out of a 2L would take to much time, you would have way to much lag.
I drive a 2010 Golf that growls at people when it goes over 3000rpm.
09-01-2005, 09:06 AM
D-Dub,Aug 31 2005, 11: Wrote:cause spooling up 2 turbos out of a 2L would take to much time, you would have way to much lag. dude... stf, :lol: if you were to twin turbo a 2 liter, I hope you would use such small turbo... i.e. designed for being spooled by 1 liter, there should be no LAG AT ALL... it is just stupid to do this because of the increased hassle to do so. B)
------------------------------------------------
-1991 Nissan Pulsar GTI-R -2002 Red SVT focus # 2262 - sold -2000 silver ZX3 - sold
09-01-2005, 09:26 AM
Alright...it seen's like it's not a great idea so i'll stick with the 1 turbo.
Turbo arrived!
09-01-2005, 09:31 AM
unless your in show, and multiple turbo mean more points, there is no need for it, it is used on V engine for ease of turbo manifold, but as you must know, a lot of TT cars from factory benefit from swapping for a single matched turbo in both power and reliability.
------------------------------------------------
-1991 Nissan Pulsar GTI-R -2002 Red SVT focus # 2262 - sold -2000 silver ZX3 - sold 
09-02-2005, 06:09 AM
Your having enuff of a hard time making up your mind with 1 turbo. Dont go confusing yourself with another one. :P :lol:
![[Image: ncclogo.jpg]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v76/Flofocus/ncclogo.jpg)
09-02-2005, 06:13 AM
Flofocus,Sep 1 2005, 04:09 PM Wrote:Your having enuff of a hard time making up your mind with 1 turbo. Dont go confusing yourself with another one. :P :lol: :lol: :D!
Turbo arrived!
09-03-2005, 04:59 PM
french_connection,Aug 31 2005, 07:06 PM Wrote:D-Dub,Aug 31 2005, 11: Wrote:cause spooling up 2 turbos out of a 2L would take to much time, you would have way to much lag. Never heard of one liter cars or turbos designed for them, so hence why I said there would be lag................
I drive a 2010 Golf that growls at people when it goes over 3000rpm.
09-06-2005, 03:02 AM
you could run anything on anything, I saw a mustang running a huge caterpillar turbo diesel turbo converted for racing...
you can get any size turbo if you look allright...
------------------------------------------------
-1991 Nissan Pulsar GTI-R -2002 Red SVT focus # 2262 - sold -2000 silver ZX3 - sold 
09-07-2005, 01:39 AM
well doesn't the application of TT resolve the lag issue? a smaller turbo for low end and a bigger one for top end?
how would going TT = lots of lag?
***want to buy***
MBRP................ check SCT Xcal2 ........ check VF mounts Adj. Dampers ... check Meford's Mom.... sale pending
09-07-2005, 02:28 AM
Nass, depending on how you set them up, lets use a V8 for example, you could run 1 turbo to feed 8 cylinders, or you could use 2 half sized turbo to feed 4 cylinders each, which would decreased the spool time.
or, you could go in serie, small turbo followed by a big turbo... but I dont know too much about this setup. It sounds kinda frankenstein to me.
------------------------------------------------
-1991 Nissan Pulsar GTI-R -2002 Red SVT focus # 2262 - sold -2000 silver ZX3 - sold
09-07-2005, 03:41 AM
french_connection,Sep 6 2005, 04:28 PM Wrote:Nass, depending on how you set them up, lets use a V8 for example, you could run 1 turbo to feed 8 cylinders, or you could use 2 half sized turbo to feed 4 cylinders each, which would decreased the spool time. hmm I thought that most TT setups were small>bigger turbos.... I know that the Audi S4 is like that the older ones before they went NA but then again I don't know too much about turbo setups I just like the sound they make woooooooooooooooooooooooooooshhhhh pssssssss
***want to buy***
MBRP................ check SCT Xcal2 ........ check VF mounts Adj. Dampers ... check Meford's Mom.... sale pending 
09-07-2005, 06:27 AM
Isnt that why the S4 setup is called BIturbo instead of twin turbo
I thought biturbo setups had the small turbo feeding into the large to reduce the lag vs twin turbos... twin seperated turbos.
05 Altima SE-R
98 Grand Cherokee 5.9: Flowmaster; K&N 05 300C 5.7: Sold 99 Civic SIR: Sold 03 Focus SVT: Sold 01 Focus ZX3: Sold
09-08-2005, 03:18 AM
k now you're getting picky!
***want to buy***
MBRP................ check SCT Xcal2 ........ check VF mounts Adj. Dampers ... check Meford's Mom.... sale pending 
09-08-2005, 05:08 AM
header - turbo - BOV - turbo - BOV - Intake
and u get a double wooooooooooooooosh pssssssssssss :lol:
03 ZX5, TrAcK rEaDy
 ![[Image: signature.jpg]](http://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q82/djrard/signature.jpg)
09-08-2005, 05:26 AM
scoobasteve,Sep 6 2005, 04:27 PM Wrote:Isnt that why the S4 setup is called BIturbo instead of twin turbo nass,Sep 7 2005, 01:18 PM Wrote:k now you're getting picky! Haha, i was clarifying it for myself too.
05 Altima SE-R
98 Grand Cherokee 5.9: Flowmaster; K&N 05 300C 5.7: Sold 99 Civic SIR: Sold 03 Focus SVT: Sold 01 Focus ZX3: Sold
11-02-2005, 05:34 AM
Twinscroll. Effective power through the full rpm range and no lag.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)