[darkpuppet]

nass,Jun 21 2006, 07:15 PM Wrote:instead of thinking that the US government was in on the attacks you should just think that they knew there was a real threat but failed to act upon it. Why would they not act upon this real threat from good sources? and why would they give a half assed attack on the country that the attack came from and fail to capture the man resonsible for it to go attack another country that had no ties to the attack or mastermind behind it and spend months looking for it's leader and make a big deal about making the world that much safer?

Saddam has never attacked America on American soil, to the best of my knowledge so why make a big deal about it?

bah all this talk gets you no where besides pissed off, why does a president like JFK get shot and Bush not!
[right][snapback]194562[/snapback][/right]

haha.. have you seen the guy leading the country? he sure seems pretty clueless to me.

I think that the statements of contrition (<--that's a word, right?) made immediately following the attacks genuinely reflect their thoughts before they had a chance to work on covering up their asses. They DID fail the american public...

trying to move the blame off them, and then following their own agendas after the fact is just ... well, typical of such a leadership IMO.