Hi, Guest
|
Fuel Economy Worse In 2007 Than In 1992
|
10-12-2007, 04:43 AM
Another issue to consider is that back in '92 they were still using those ridculous laboratory tests to get their fuel economy numbers that had near zero relation to real world driving. I'd bet if you ran those cars back then with the revised tests, the numbers would be much worse///
NefCanuck |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Fuel Economy Worse In 2007 Than In 1992 - darkpuppet - 10-12-2007, 02:05 AM
Fuel Economy Worse In 2007 Than In 1992 - cornflakes - 10-12-2007, 02:24 AM
Fuel Economy Worse In 2007 Than In 1992 - Frost__2001 - 10-12-2007, 02:32 AM
Fuel Economy Worse In 2007 Than In 1992 - NefCanuck - 10-12-2007, 04:43 AM
Fuel Economy Worse In 2007 Than In 1992 - NOS2Go4Me - 10-12-2007, 05:16 AM
Fuel Economy Worse In 2007 Than In 1992 - dBlast - 10-12-2007, 08:57 AM
Fuel Economy Worse In 2007 Than In 1992 - D-Dub - 10-12-2007, 10:23 AM
Fuel Economy Worse In 2007 Than In 1992 - Canadian ST - 10-12-2007, 11:29 AM
Fuel Economy Worse In 2007 Than In 1992 - FocusGuy7476 - 10-12-2007, 12:13 PM
Fuel Economy Worse In 2007 Than In 1992 - D-Dub - 10-12-2007, 10:40 PM
Fuel Economy Worse In 2007 Than In 1992 - darkpuppet - 10-12-2007, 11:05 PM
Fuel Economy Worse In 2007 Than In 1992 - D-Dub - 10-14-2007, 08:54 AM
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| 2009 Ford Fusion To Offer Better Fuel Economy | Frost__2001 | 5 | 2,739 |
04-25-2008, 10:49 AM Last Post: ZTWsquared |
|
