Hi, Guest
01-06-2008, 02:58 PM
Hrm, okay let's look at this from a legal angle for a sec...
Dipstick driver pulls ahead of cop and is obviously speeding correct?
Is it not in the interest of public safety to shut down this tool as soon as he begins behaving in a dangerous and aggressive manner on the roads?
Therefore, cop could have and should have shut him down long before the kid cracked "Fantino's Fifty Law"
If all they charge him with is the over 50, they're screwed, even if they tack on the aggressive driving charges I can see the defense lawyer using the entrapment angle... and quite possible winning...
NefCanuck
Dipstick driver pulls ahead of cop and is obviously speeding correct?
Is it not in the interest of public safety to shut down this tool as soon as he begins behaving in a dangerous and aggressive manner on the roads?
Therefore, cop could have and should have shut him down long before the kid cracked "Fantino's Fifty Law"
If all they charge him with is the over 50, they're screwed, even if they tack on the aggressive driving charges I can see the defense lawyer using the entrapment angle... and quite possible winning...
NefCanuck