The way it was explained to me is that snow is the
last place you want floatation.
Sand?, yes, you usually want floatation.
Stay on top - less resistance.
Snow is usually slippery.
Being on top is slippery.
With a narrower tire, you get your finite
weight to bite deeper into the snow.
Make sense?
The way it was explained to me is:
snow is the last place you want floatation.
Sand, yes, you usually want floatation.
Staying on top of sand is best.
Snow, on top, is slippery.
A narrower tire gets your finite weight
into the deeper area of snow.
More bit.
And, it worked on my Ranger.
Make sense?
Is it true that it's better to drive on narrower rather than wider tires during winter? ie. 195 rather than 205 because supposedly you're getting better grip
[/quote]
last place you want floatation.
Sand?, yes, you usually want floatation.
Stay on top - less resistance.
Snow is usually slippery.
Being on top is slippery.
With a narrower tire, you get your finite
weight to bite deeper into the snow.
Make sense?
The way it was explained to me is:
snow is the last place you want floatation.
Sand, yes, you usually want floatation.
Staying on top of sand is best.
Snow, on top, is slippery.
A narrower tire gets your finite weight
into the deeper area of snow.
More bit.
And, it worked on my Ranger.
Make sense?
Is it true that it's better to drive on narrower rather than wider tires during winter? ie. 195 rather than 205 because supposedly you're getting better grip
[/quote]