03-31-2011, 04:07 AM
(03-30-2011, 04:56 AM)Flofocus Wrote:(03-26-2011, 01:46 PM)GFXjamie Wrote: and its not a MD its a Dynojet which is far more accurate
No, people like dynojets because they get higher numbers. I wouldn't say they are far more accurate than a MD.
tell me how oscar made more power at steedas MD than at dasilvas dynojet? LOL
also, when we went to steeda, my car made 139whp and 165wtq, that is simply not possible for a 2.0l w/ I/H/E tune etc... atleast the Dynojet was giving us pretty accurate numbers by comparison to comparable cars that have had other dynos done in other areas of the world.
I bet pat doesnt know how to calibrate the dyno properly, not only that but they are morons for everything that they have done in the past to people. IE tony's SVT and they still last i heard around christmas have not made things right
2007 ZX4 2.0l unaturally aspirated
FSwerks stage 2 Turbo kit, Cosworth Intake Manifold, 3" custom HKS turbo back
regular stage 2 @10ps : 232whp/219wtq
stage 2 plus @ 13psi: 278whp/229wtq
Stage 2 plus @15psi: 296whp/240wtq
2013 Focus ST Tuxedo Black - The daily
FSwerks stage 2 Turbo kit, Cosworth Intake Manifold, 3" custom HKS turbo back
regular stage 2 @10ps : 232whp/219wtq
stage 2 plus @ 13psi: 278whp/229wtq
Stage 2 plus @15psi: 296whp/240wtq
2013 Focus ST Tuxedo Black - The daily