[Marction]

2001 ZTS,Mar 21 2005, 10:54 PM Wrote:

BerinG,Mar 21 2005, 03:04 PM Wrote:.. taste is an opinion, you can't argu opinions..
[right][snapback]95283[/snapback][/right]

But you cannot deny performance.

If people want to compromize overall performance for looks they are welcome to do so. The fact is 99% of the time, and for 99% of drivers here I (we) could out accelerate, out stop, out corner, out Fu ck the guy in original picture on any road and any weather he picked.

I've even said I'll take them on with my wifes stupid auto-magic.

To degrade one's car so is ghey. If it means more points at a "show" why not buy an oil painting? You'd make more money.
[right][snapback]95539[/snapback][/right]

exactly how I feel...if "rice" generally refers to cars with non-performance enhancing parts that imply enhanced performance, then WTF is adding something that potentially (or actually) *compromises* performance?

i.e. many (like me) would consider that even worse that what people consider rice...if it's on the road, that is. While I don't care for the show scene *at all*, on a show car, whatever, it's fine...driviability isn't a primary concern there.

I'm guessing an insurance company would attempt to deny a claim if a tire failed (for whatever that's worth when considering a mod).