[nass]

bluetoy,Feb 1 2006, 10:06 PM Wrote:Here's my take.

Focusonthis went to his buddy and ordered some stuff. No deposit or contract req'd because they're friends. Items arrive damaged. They are reordered. Fallout between friends and Focusonthis bails, leaving the store stuck with mucho product.

Focusonthis is morally obligated to get the stuff he ordered. A lawyer could probably put the screws to him as well.
[right][snapback]167991[/snapback][/right]

Courts only consider the legal aspects of any case. They Rarely ever take into consideration any moral wrong doing. It's a court of law not a courst of morals. Judge Judy taught me that one :)

I think though if a previous trial went in the favour of the store than they can use that case as evidence for you case if it ever gets that far. I can't remember if our legal sysem works that way up here.