[darkpuppet]

naz,Mar 18 2006, 03:19 AM Wrote:cars can be replaced but people can't... f$% that why the heck would you want to keep a THIEF around?!

and as for shoot first ask questions later.. what would you guys prefer.. the owner of the vehicle going up the guy and saying.. oh excuse me sir. please stop trying to steal my car.. shoo bad person shoo.. ooo oo or better yet.. he should have said.. oh you must want to sell this car to feed your poor starving family.. here please take the keys.. and take the keys for my other car too..

the guy is friggin STEALING SOMEONE'S CAR!!! how can you have any type of sympathy of him?!?!?!

EDIT: that avatar was def not cool.... but i still do think he was in the right for protecting his property
[right][snapback]175626[/snapback][/right]

you know, my initial thought would be to kill the thief, but honestly, the situation could have been handled without nearly killing a human being, and without putting holes in the car because the guy is a poor shot. For every bullet that doesn't stop in the thief, innocents are put at risk.

The family was not in danger, but he still took it upon himself to take the thief's and possibly innocent lives into his own hands.

I'm just amazed that people think that killing someone outright is a just thing to do.. the thief deserves to go to jail and/or get the snot beaten out of him, but killing him? when does the right to bear arms to protect yourself turn into the right to kill a man because he doesn't have respect for your property. I don't deny having the right to protect your property, but if your person is not in jeopardy, the shooter had no right to fire 4 rounds at the theif.