Posts: 1,939
Threads: 101
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
0
Quote:Despite being smaller than the outgoing 4.0-liter V6, the dual-overhead cam 3.7-liter's horsepower and torque ratings represent massive improvements over the 2010 model (305 HP dismisses 210 HP and 280 lb-ft. plays 240 torques). In fact, that's more horsepower than the 4.6-liter V8 Mustang made just a few years ago. While the 305-horse figure only allows the Mustang to pip the crosstown Camaro by a single all-important stallion in the pony car bragging wars, Ford says the powertrain will be good for 30 miles-per-gallon on the highway when paired with its new six-speed automatic, also one notch better than the Chevy.
Wow, I'd actually consider a V6 now...Love these numbers for the V6 as I would assume this means some good things for the GT. Camaro/Chally who? B)
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/30/2...-2009-preview/
Posts: 7,314
Threads: 381
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation:
0
Nice.
Can't wait to pump these big guys at the track........or get pumped. lol
2002 Ford Focus ZTS (Gave it away)
125whp/129wtq
2006 Subaru Impreza WRX with JDM 6 speed
207whp/273wtq Innovative tuned on Mustang dyno (Stage 2)13.9@99mph
320whp/330wtq Innovative tuned on Mustang dyno (Stage 3)
352whp/360wtq Dynojet
13.3@106mph
2004 Ford F-150 Lariat
2008 Honda CBR600RR "Silver Bullet" R.I.P.
2009 Honda CBR600RR "To Punish & Enslave"
2001 Honda CBR F4i Stunt bike "Burn the Rubber, not your soul"
2013 China 90cc dirt bike
Posts: 5,027
Threads: 313
Joined: May 2003
Reputation:
21
SVT ZX3,Nov 30 2009, 05:05 PM Wrote:Quote:Despite being smaller than the outgoing 4.0-liter V6, the dual-overhead cam 3.7-liter's horsepower and torque ratings represent massive improvements over the 2010 model (305 HP dismisses 210 HP and 280 lb-ft. plays 240 torques). In fact, that's more horsepower than the 4.6-liter V8 Mustang made just a few years ago. While the 305-horse figure only allows the Mustang to pip the crosstown Camaro by a single all-important stallion in the pony car bragging wars, Ford says the powertrain will be good for 30 miles-per-gallon on the highway when paired with its new six-speed automatic, also one notch better than the Chevy.
Wow, I'd actually consider a V6 now...Love these numbers for the V6 as I would assume this means some good things for the GT. Camaro/Chally who? B)
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/30/2...-2009-preview/
[right][snapback]297896[/snapback][/right]
Probably a tweaked version of the Lincoln Duratec 37 ... which means that bolting up the twin turbo 3.5 could be an easy option too ... very interesting.
2008 Fusion SEL MTX - DD1 * 2009 Fusion SEL - DD2 * 2007 Focus ZXW - R*I*P * 2004 Focus ZTW CD Silver - sold * 2004 Focus ZTW Black - sold * 2003 Focus ZTW Black - sold * 2001 Focus ZTW Gold - sold * 2000 Focus SE Wagon (ZTW option) - Black - sold * 2000 Focus SE Wagon (ZTW option) - Gold R*I*P
2003 Focus ZX5 infra-red Track Rat - R*I*P
2003 ZX5 CD Silver Track Rat - retired, but still in the driveway
New track rat: 2000 ZX3, Atlantic Blue * JRSC with lots more to come
* New Zetec crate motor - NFG - thanks Topspeed *
Posts: 2,773
Threads: 60
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
...very nice... I could actually see myself behind the wheel of a 6cyl Mustang in the future with this on the horizon!
'14 Escape 2.0t
2012 5dr Ti : Traded
Posts: 4,037
Threads: 305
Joined: Jun 2003
Reputation:
9
But it makes you think what they could do to the V8 :)
Posts: 7,485
Threads: 173
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
2
Thing is though, will this engine be lighter or heavier than the outgoing 4.0L?
Either will require suspension reworking to account for the weight differential.
Great now I'll definitely get punked out by V6 Stangs on the track :ph34r: (Current gen it really depends on who is behind the wheel)
NefCanuck
Posts: 1,566
Threads: 72
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
2
NefCanuck,Dec 1 2009, 12:02 AM Wrote:Thing is though, will this engine be lighter or heavier than the outgoing 4.0L?
Either will require suspension reworking to account for the weight differential.
[right][snapback]297909[/snapback][/right]
Same weight, more power. :)
http://jalopnik.com/5408309/2011-ford-must...05-hp-v6-30-mpg
Oh, and the track pack with 19" inch rims and Brembo brakes will be available too... :D And 6-Speeds for all! :lol:
The GT is going to end up being around 400 hp, thanks to the new 5.0L 'Coyote' engine.
http://jalopnik.com/5351785/2011-ford-must...x+speed-gearbox
Ryan and the Silver Sedan
++++++++++++++++++++++++
2008 Mazda5 GS/Copper Red Mica/2.3 MZR 5AT/22% Tint
2011 Ford F150 FX4 Supercrew/Race Red/3.5 TT EcoBoost
Posts: 7,314
Threads: 381
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation:
0
MMMM 5.0L
What's the starting price on one of those puppies?
2002 Ford Focus ZTS (Gave it away)
125whp/129wtq
2006 Subaru Impreza WRX with JDM 6 speed
207whp/273wtq Innovative tuned on Mustang dyno (Stage 2)13.9@99mph
320whp/330wtq Innovative tuned on Mustang dyno (Stage 3)
352whp/360wtq Dynojet
13.3@106mph
2004 Ford F-150 Lariat
2008 Honda CBR600RR "Silver Bullet" R.I.P.
2009 Honda CBR600RR "To Punish & Enslave"
2001 Honda CBR F4i Stunt bike "Burn the Rubber, not your soul"
2013 China 90cc dirt bike
Posts: 9,588
Threads: 529
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation:
1
12-02-2009, 01:49 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2009, 01:51 AM by NOS2Go4Me.)
ZTWsquared,Nov 30 2009, 06:03 PM Wrote:Probably a tweaked version of the Lincoln Duratec 37 ... which means that bolting up the twin turbo 3.5 could be an easy option too ... very interesting.
[right][snapback]297903[/snapback][/right]
I see what you did there. Now I want to try that.
Keep in mind that the stock EcoBoost 3.5L doesn't need 91 octane to run. So, chances are the 3.7L V6 makes all that power with 87 as well.
This is why I stick with Ford. Year after year, their engines are top-notch.
Time to swap the 2010 Escape 240HP V6 into my Escape :P
Daily driver 1: 2007 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Sport "S"
33" BFG Mud-Terrain KM2s, lots of Rough Country gear - bumper, 2.5" lift, swaybar disconnects, Superwinch 10,000lb winch, Detroit Locker in rear D44 axle, custom exhaust, K+N filtercharger, Superchips-tuned.
Daily driver 2: 2006 Subaru Legacy GT
COBB Stage 1+ package - AccessPort tuner, COBB intake and airbox. Stage 2 coming shortly - COBB 3" AT stainless DP and race cat, custom 3" Magnaflow-based exhaust and Stage 2 COBB tune.
Posts: 7,485
Threads: 173
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
2
Grr... must resist urge to try and shoehorn bigger motor into car (3.5L would be easy enough, but the 3.7 would probably require a literal crowbar to get into the engine bay :ph34r:)
NefCanuck
Posts: 1,562
Threads: 34
Joined: May 2003
Reputation:
0
12-02-2009, 04:31 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2009, 07:30 AM by D-Dub.)
NefCanuck,Dec 1 2009, 01:06 PM Wrote:Grr... must resist urge to try and shoehorn bigger motor into car (3.5L would be easy enough, but the 3.7 would probably require a literal crowbar to get into the engine bay :ph34r:)
NefCanuck
[right][snapback]297915[/snapback][/right]
Its the same engine.....the cylinders have been bored out
I drive a 2010 Golf that growls at people when it goes over 3000rpm.
Posts: 788
Threads: 55
Joined: Nov 2006
Reputation:
0
Someone tell Ford to get rid of those awful gauges!!
Damn, am I the only one who hates this part of the retro look!
2007 CD Silver ST **** FOR SALE ****
2014 Performance Blue ST **** SOLD ****
2016 Ford Edge Sport Shadow Black
Posts: 7,485
Threads: 173
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
2
D-Dub,Dec 1 2009, 01: Wrote:NefCanuck,Dec 1 2009, 01:06 PM Wrote:Grr... must resist urge to try and shoehorn bigger motor into car (3.5L would be easy enough, but the 3.7 would probably require a literal crowbar to get into the engine bay :ph34r:)
NefCanuck
[right][snapback]297915[/snapback][/right]
Its the same engine.....the cylinders have been bored out
[right][snapback]297918[/snapback][/right]
Ah, I did not know that.... good grief, I need to win the Lotto Max, then I would embark on an insane project like that, just to say that I did it :lol: ( Of course it would probably make the car nose heavy as all hell :P)
NefCanuck
Posts: 7,485
Threads: 173
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
2
Gravter,Dec 2 2009, 09:13 AM Wrote:Someone tell Ford to get rid of those awful gauges!!
Damn, am I the only one who hates this part of the retro look!
[right][snapback]297937[/snapback][/right]
You're the first one I've heard complain about the "Twin Cowl" look in the Mustang :huh:
Personally I love it mainly because it reminds me of my dad's old '67 Mustang (I think that and A/C were the few options that car had, hell, it had power brakes and manual steering :ph34r:)
NefCanuck
Posts: 788
Threads: 55
Joined: Nov 2006
Reputation:
0
12-03-2009, 02:50 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-03-2009, 02:52 AM by Gravter.)
I guess I simply love modern look... but not too modern as in digital readout... I hate those too.
My 99 Cobra wasn't too modern but I loved the gauge layout.
My brother-in-law has a 64 1/2 stang with a 300 in-line 6 and has these kind of gauges and look ok with that years interior look.
I like the shelby interior gauges though!
2007 CD Silver ST **** FOR SALE ****
2014 Performance Blue ST **** SOLD ****
2016 Ford Edge Sport Shadow Black
Posts: 7,314
Threads: 381
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation:
0
Gravter,Dec 2 2009, 09:13 AM Wrote:Someone tell Ford to get rid of those awful gauges!!
Damn, am I the only one who hates this part of the retro look!
[right][snapback]297937[/snapback][/right]
I LOVE IT
:)
2002 Ford Focus ZTS (Gave it away)
125whp/129wtq
2006 Subaru Impreza WRX with JDM 6 speed
207whp/273wtq Innovative tuned on Mustang dyno (Stage 2)13.9@99mph
320whp/330wtq Innovative tuned on Mustang dyno (Stage 3)
352whp/360wtq Dynojet
13.3@106mph
2004 Ford F-150 Lariat
2008 Honda CBR600RR "Silver Bullet" R.I.P.
2009 Honda CBR600RR "To Punish & Enslave"
2001 Honda CBR F4i Stunt bike "Burn the Rubber, not your soul"
2013 China 90cc dirt bike
Posts: 9,104
Threads: 411
Joined: May 2003
Reputation:
2
NefCanuck,Dec 2 2009, 11:25 AM Wrote:(Of course it would probably make the car nose heavy as all hell :P)
NefCanuck
[right][snapback]297946[/snapback][/right]
why is that?
Posts: 7,485
Threads: 173
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
2
Flofocus,Dec 2 2009, 03:00 PM Wrote:NefCanuck,Dec 2 2009, 11:25 AM Wrote:(Of course it would probably make the car nose heavy as all hell :P)
NefCanuck
[right][snapback]297946[/snapback][/right]
why is that?
[right][snapback]297959[/snapback][/right]
The chassis on the Fusion isn't set up for the larger block (IIRC the MKZ has specific suspension upgrades up front to handle the extra mass of the bigger block)
Now of course with the changes I've made to my specific car's suspension, there would be no issue of doing a ram & cram of the bigger MKZ motor :D
NefCanuck
Posts: 1,562
Threads: 34
Joined: May 2003
Reputation:
0
NefCanuck,Dec 2 2009, 04:19 PM Wrote:Flofocus,Dec 2 2009, 03:00 PM Wrote:NefCanuck,Dec 2 2009, 11:25 AM Wrote:(Of course it would probably make the car nose heavy as all hell :P)
NefCanuck
[right][snapback]297946[/snapback][/right]
why is that?
[right][snapback]297959[/snapback][/right]
The chassis on the Fusion isn't set up for the larger block (IIRC the MKZ has specific suspension upgrades up front to handle the extra mass of the bigger block)
Now of course with the changes I've made to my specific car's suspension, there would be no issue of doing a ram & cram of the bigger MKZ motor :D
NefCanuck
[right][snapback]297960[/snapback][/right]
If you had a spare 3.5 you could do this no problem, there is already a fusion that has this( 2010 SPORT)......or you could just sell your car and get the sport.
I drive a 2010 Golf that growls at people when it goes over 3000rpm.
Posts: 7,485
Threads: 173
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
2
True but teh Sports suspension is different than lesser Fusions.
Sell my car and have to start all over again :blink:
But I haven't even finished what I want to do with this one yet :P
NefCanuck
|