Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Prove The Earth Rotates Around The Sun
#1
I doubt they can be reasoned with

from Catholic Apologetics International...

Quote:CAI will write a check for $1,000 to the first person who can prove that the earth revolves around the sun. (If you lose, then we ask that you make a donation to the apostolate of CAI). Obviously, we at CAI don't think anyone CAN prove it, and thus we can offer such a generous reward. In fact, we may up the ante in the near future.
Contribute to focuscanada.net's future!

Donations of $20 and over get a custom title!







Reply
#2
It'll take place over 6 months, preferably using top-grade observatories around the world. Our proximity to other planets will change, other celestial distances will change, but our proximity to the sun won't.

if the sun orbits the Earth, then how can they account for the orbits of the other 8 (9?) planets? Are these guys for real?

Or let me guess, the other planets don't exist because there's no life on them and therefore nothing for the next great Crusade. :rolleyes:

What's next? The Earth doesn't rotate, the tides are caused by God?
Daily driver 1: 2007 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Sport "S"

33" BFG Mud-Terrain KM2s, lots of Rough Country gear - bumper, 2.5" lift, swaybar disconnects, Superwinch 10,000lb winch, Detroit Locker in rear D44 axle, custom exhaust, K+N filtercharger, Superchips-tuned.

Daily driver 2: 2006 Subaru Legacy GT

COBB Stage 1+ package - AccessPort tuner, COBB intake and airbox. Stage 2 coming shortly - COBB 3" AT stainless DP and race cat, custom 3" Magnaflow-based exhaust and Stage 2 COBB tune.
Reply
#3
Quote:Now a word of caution. By "proof" we mean that your explanations must be direct, observable, physical, natural, repeatable, unambiguous and comprehensive. We don't want hearsay, popular opinion, "expert" testimony, majority vote, personal conviction, organizational rulings, superficial analogies, appeals to "simplicity," "apologies" to Galileo, or any other indirect means of persuasion which do not qualify as scientific proof.

and if I follow their "scientific thought", your proof better come from the literal words out of the bible.
Contribute to focuscanada.net's future!

Donations of $20 and over get a custom title!







Reply
#4
Yeah I won't comment on this much, honestly I'm a heavy believer in the 'Big Bang Theory' and scientific proof of the universe and don't hold religion to the level that some do. Personally I feel that some religions are more like 'cults' then anything......

As mentioned above....

if the sun orbits the Earth, then how can they account for the orbits of the other 8 (9?) planets? Are these guys for real?

EXACTLY!!!
Reply
#5
consider also that they've sent satellites to the edge of the universe which
a ) wouldn't even be possible if the basis of their calculations were wrong
b ) they have pictures looking into the center of our universe, and lo-and-behold, the planets, including earth always seem to be moving AROUND the sun.
Contribute to focuscanada.net's future!

Donations of $20 and over get a custom title!







Reply
#6
they want proof.. we have pictures...
voyager took pictures
the diagram of the pictures taken
Contribute to focuscanada.net's future!

Donations of $20 and over get a custom title!







Reply
#7
The moonshot was a hoax. :ph34r:
TEAM PITA: Don't settle for a wannabe, only accept the real deal.
*Magnetic Metallic 2015 Focus ST* *Red Candy Metallic 2012 F150 SuperCrew*
*Supercharged Roush Phase 2 Kona Blue 2012 Mustang GT*
Reply
#8
Quote:Now a word of caution. By "proof" we mean that your explanations must be direct, observable, physical, natural, repeatable, unambiguous and comprehensive. We don't want hearsay, popular opinion, "expert" testimony, majority vote, personal conviction, organizational rulings, superficial analogies, appeals to "simplicity," "apologies" to Galileo, or any other indirect means of persuasion which do not qualify as scientific proof.

That's right - you wouldn't want any "experts" weighing in on this.

So with this definition of "proof" - how they heck could you prove anything - including their own theory that the sun revolves around the earth? The answer is you can't.

What they're doing here is narrowing the definition of what constitutes proof to the point where no answer will be deemed acceptable ... and in doing that they can now claim that no one is able to offer "proof" that the earth revolves around the sun.

It's a classic positioning technique (spin) and an effective one ... I use it all the time.
2008 Fusion SEL MTX - DD1 * 2009 Fusion SEL - DD2 * 2007 Focus ZXW - R*I*P * 2004 Focus ZTW CD Silver - sold * 2004 Focus ZTW Black - sold * 2003 Focus ZTW Black - sold * 2001 Focus ZTW Gold - sold * 2000 Focus SE Wagon (ZTW option) - Black - sold * 2000 Focus SE Wagon (ZTW option) - Gold R*I*P

2003 Focus ZX5 infra-red Track Rat - R*I*P
2003 ZX5 CD Silver Track Rat - retired, but still in the driveway


New track rat: 2000 ZX3, Atlantic Blue * JRSC with lots more to come

* New Zetec crate motor - NFG - thanks Topspeed *
Reply
#9
I dunno, I think having pictures of the planets exactly where they should be based on current theories and models is pretty good proof.

EDIT: And personally, I don't think their definition of proof is too extreme, in all honesty that's what should be demanded of for proof.
Reply
#10
f***tards pure and simple
I was the only member on this board with a Yellow Focus Sedan, and a 2002+ Euro Facelift on a sedan.
Reply
#11
ZTWsquared,Feb 15 2006, 12:17 PM Wrote:
Quote:Now a word of caution. By "proof" we mean that your explanations must be direct, observable, physical, natural, repeatable, unambiguous and comprehensive. We don't want hearsay, popular opinion, "expert" testimony, majority vote, personal conviction, organizational rulings, superficial analogies, appeals to "simplicity," "apologies" to Galileo, or any other indirect means of persuasion which do not qualify as scientific proof.

That's right - you wouldn't want any "experts" weighing in on this.

So with this definition of "proof" - how they heck could you prove anything - including their own theory that the sun revolves around the earth? The answer is you can't.

What they're doing here is narrowing the definition of what constitutes proof to the point where no answer will be deemed acceptable ... and in doing that they can now claim that no one is able to offer "proof" that the earth revolves around the sun.

It's a classic positioning technique (spin) and an effective one ... I use it all the time.
[right][snapback]170636[/snapback][/right]

That's why I said use multiple observatories, over a period of 6 months or so. You can't deny mathematical data from multiple sources, over and over again.
Daily driver 1: 2007 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Sport "S"

33" BFG Mud-Terrain KM2s, lots of Rough Country gear - bumper, 2.5" lift, swaybar disconnects, Superwinch 10,000lb winch, Detroit Locker in rear D44 axle, custom exhaust, K+N filtercharger, Superchips-tuned.

Daily driver 2: 2006 Subaru Legacy GT

COBB Stage 1+ package - AccessPort tuner, COBB intake and airbox. Stage 2 coming shortly - COBB 3" AT stainless DP and race cat, custom 3" Magnaflow-based exhaust and Stage 2 COBB tune.
Reply
#12
Frost__2001,Feb 15 2006, 04:07 PM Wrote:f***tards pure and simple
[right][snapback]170697[/snapback][/right]


hey, don't desecrate the name.

they are asshats :lol:
TEAM PITA Don't settle for a wannabe, only accept the real deal.

One day I will rule the world. For now, I have to settle for this place.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)